Meiggs v. Hoagland
80 N.Y.S. 1140
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Meiggs v. Hoagland. Read the opinion of the Court — 68 A.D. 182 →
Opinions
We think that inasmuch as 30 years had not expired at the time of the trial of this action, after the second record in Pennsylvania, the decision of this case must be controlled by the former decision in Meiggs v. Hoagland, 68 App. Div. 182, 74 N. Y. Supp. 234. Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, costs to the appellant to abide the final award of costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meiggs v. Hoagland, 80 N.Y.S. 1140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).
80 N.Y.S. 1140 (Meiggs v. Hoagland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Meiggs v. Hoagland
68 A.D. 182 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
In re Langbein
1 Dem. Sur. 448 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1882)