Meier v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meier v. Mahoney

113 A.D.2d 1020, 494 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52645

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 113 A.D.2d 1020 (Meier v. Mahoney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meier v. Mahoney, 113 A.D.2d 1020, 494 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52645 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We affirm the denial of petitioner’s application to invalidate respondent Dixon’s designating petition. Petitioner has proven no violation of the Election Law. In the absence of any allegation of fraud, it would be manifestly unfair to deprive respondent of a place on the ballot solely because the Board of Elections lost her original petition, where such a disqualification is not mandated by any express provision of the Election Law. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.— Election Law.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ. (Decision entered Aug. 21, 1985.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We affirm the denial of petitioner’s application to invalidate respondent Dixon’s designating petition. Petitioner has proven no violation of the Election Law. In the absence of any allegation of fraud, it would be manifestly unfair to deprive respondent of a place on the ballot solely because the Board of Elections lost her original petition, where such a disqualification is not mandated by any express provision of the Election Law. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.— Election Law.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ. (Decision entered Aug. 21, 1985.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 A.D.2d 1020, 494 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meier-v-mahoney-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack