Meier v. Florida

Supreme Court

Meier v. Florida

269 U.S. 533, 46 S. Ct. 99

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 26, 1925

DocketNo. 63

StatusPublished

This text of 269 U.S. 533 (Meier v. Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meier v. Florida, 269 U.S. 533, 46 S. Ct. 99 (1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for' want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code as amended [534]*534by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39,Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6.

Mr. Henry C. Clark with whom Messrs. Oscar O. McCollum, Charles Cook Howell and Austin Miller were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Rivers Buford and Marvin Crosby McIntosh for defendant in error submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for' want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code as amended [534]*534by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39,Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6.

Mr. Henry C. Clark with whom Messrs. Oscar O. McCollum, Charles Cook Howell and Austin Miller were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Rivers Buford and Marvin Crosby McIntosh for defendant in error submitted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 U.S. 533, 46 S. Ct. 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meier-v-florida-scotus-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack