Meier v. Cooperative Extension Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meier v. Cooperative Extension Ass'n

51 A.D.2d 572, 378 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10853

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 572 (Meier v. Cooperative Extension Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meier v. Cooperative Extension Ass'n, 51 A.D.2d 572, 378 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10853 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR, inter alia, for the reinstate[573]*573ment of petitioner as an employee of the respondent Orange County Cooperative Extension Association, he appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated May 23, 1975, as, in directing reinstatement, failed to award back pay. Permission for the taking of this appeal is hereby granted by Mr. Justice Rabin. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. Special Term did not abuse its discretion in conditioning petitioner’s right to back salary on the result of a subsequent hearing, which hearing shall accord with all procedural requirements, as indicated in its decision dated May 23, 1975 and made at the time of its signing of the counter judgment. Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Margett and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR, inter alia, for the reinstate[573]*573ment of petitioner as an employee of the respondent Orange County Cooperative Extension Association, he appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated May 23, 1975, as, in directing reinstatement, failed to award back pay. Permission for the taking of this appeal is hereby granted by Mr. Justice Rabin. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. Special Term did not abuse its discretion in conditioning petitioner’s right to back salary on the result of a subsequent hearing, which hearing shall accord with all procedural requirements, as indicated in its decision dated May 23, 1975 and made at the time of its signing of the counter judgment. Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Margett and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 572, 378 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meier-v-cooperative-extension-assn-nyappdiv-1976.