Meier & Frank Co. v. Smith-Sanders

846 P.2d 1194, 118 Or. App. 261, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 222
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 17, 1993
Docket89-18180; CA A69500
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 846 P.2d 1194 (Meier & Frank Co. v. Smith-Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meier & Frank Co. v. Smith-Sanders, 846 P.2d 1194, 118 Or. App. 261, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 222 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

DEITS, P. J.

Claimant moves for reconsideration of our opinion. 115 Or App 159, 836 P2d 1359 (1992). We allow reconsideration on the issue of attorney fees. We reversed the Board’s award of attorney fees for services related to medical services and for services related to claimant’s entitlement to temporary total disability. However, as employer agrees, that part of the award of fees based on the temporary total disability dispute was not challenged on review. Accordingly, we modify the disposition to reverse only that portion of the award of attorney fees related to the medical services dispute.

We also note that the designation of employer as the prevailing party does not preclude claimant from seeking attorney fees under ORS 656.382(2).

Motion for reconsideration allowed; opinion adhered to as modified; award of attorney fees related to medical services reversed; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tri-Met, Inc. v. Wolfe
86 P.3d 111 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
846 P.2d 1194, 118 Or. App. 261, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meier-frank-co-v-smith-sanders-orctapp-1993.