Meic v. Clark

489 So. 2d 871, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8293
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 10, 1986·No. No. 86-170·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Zurich Insurance Company v. Scofi, 366 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 101 S.Ct. 1908, 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981); McClary v. O’Hare, 786 F.2d 83 (2d Cir.1986); Rankin v. City of Wichita Falls, Texas, 762 F.2d 444 (5th Cir.1985); Davidson v. O’Lone, 752 F.2d 817 (3d Cir.1984), aff’d Davidson v. Cannon, — U.S.—, 106 S.Ct. 668, 88 L.Ed.2d 677 (1986).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meic v. Clark, 489 So. 2d 871, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8293 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

489 So. 2d 871 (Meic v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parratt v. Taylor
451 U.S. 527 (Supreme Court, 1981)
Davidson v. Cannon
474 U.S. 344 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Kelso Rankin v. City Of Wichita Falls
762 F.2d 444 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)
Zurich Ins. Co. v. Scofi
366 So. 2d 1193 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)