Mei Hwa Fur Trading Corp. v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 475, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 416
United States Customs Court·Decided June 10, 1953·No. No. 57386; protests 685642-G, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Olivee, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the •items marked “A” consist of kidskin plates similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) and that the items marked “B” consist of dogskins the same as those involved in United States v. Arnhold & Co., Inc., et al. (27 C. C. P. A. 135, C. A. D. 74), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Poed, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra, only so far as the items marked “A” are concerned.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mei Hwa Fur Trading Corp. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 475, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 416 (cusc 1953).

30 Cust. Ct. 475 (Mei Hwa Fur Trading Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 266 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)