Mei Di Cao v. Holder
561 F. App'x 564
Opinion
Chinese citizen Mei Di Cao petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. After careful review, we conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See Averianova v. Holder, 592 F.3d 931, 936-37 (8th Cir.2010) (standard of review). Accordingly, the petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mei Di Cao v. Holder, 561 F. App'x 564 (8th Cir. 2014).
561 F. App'x 564 (Mei Di Cao v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Averianova v. Holder
592 F.3d 931 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)