M.E.I. Associates, Inc. v. Bilgeo Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

M.E.I. Associates, Inc. v. Bilgeo Realty Corp.

287 A.D.2d 395, 731 N.Y.S.2d 622, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9898

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 25, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 287 A.D.2d 395 (M.E.I. Associates, Inc. v. Bilgeo Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M.E.I. Associates, Inc. v. Bilgeo Realty Corp., 287 A.D.2d 395, 731 N.Y.S.2d 622, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered August 3, 2000, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the brief, declined to rule on the validity of plaintiffs order to show cause, unanimously dismissed, with costs to plaintiff.

Inasmuch as defendant landlord did not move, pursuant to CPLR 5704, to vacate the temporary restraining order (TRO) enjoining it from terminating tenant’s lease, and accepted tenant’s back rent payment during the pendency of the TRO, thereby permitting tenant to cure its default, the appeal has been rendered moot. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Andrias, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered August 3, 2000, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the brief, declined to rule on the validity of plaintiffs order to show cause, unanimously dismissed, with costs to plaintiff.

Inasmuch as defendant landlord did not move, pursuant to CPLR 5704, to vacate the temporary restraining order (TRO) enjoining it from terminating tenant’s lease, and accepted tenant’s back rent payment during the pendency of the TRO, thereby permitting tenant to cure its default, the appeal has been rendered moot. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Andrias, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 A.D.2d 395, 731 N.Y.S.2d 622, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mei-associates-inc-v-bilgeo-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2001.