Mehoves Vs. Walker River Mech. Corp.

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided February 21, 2020·No. 80582·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JEFFREY A. MEHOVES, No. 80582 Appellant, vs. WALKER RIVER MECHANICAL CORP., FILED Respondent. FEB 2 204

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order affirming a justice court judgment. Ninth Judicial District Court, Douglas County; Nathan Tod Young, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district courts have final appellate jurisdiction over cases arising in the justice courts. Nev. Const. art. 6, § 6; see also Waugh v. Casazza, 85 Nev. 520, 521, 458 P.2d 359, 360 (1969). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

—C244)tC‘"wit*II2.777 Parraguirre

J. J. Hardesty Cadish

SOMME COURT OF

-trÿ i1° NEVADA

(0) IOVA .16to

2 cc: Hon. Nathan Tod Young, District Judge Jeffrey A. Mehoves Walker River Mechanical Corp. Douglas County Clerk

SUPRBM Com OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A age. 2 1 10 MEM' IV

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mehoves Vs. Walker River Mech. Corp., (Neb. 2020).

Mehoves Vs. Walker River Mech. Corp. (Mehoves Vs. Walker River Mech. Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Waugh v. Casazza
458 P.2d 359 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1969)