Mehl v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 22-1586V
SANDRA MEHL, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: December 9, 2024 v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Jonathan Joseph Svitak, Shannon Law Group, P.C., Woodridge, IL, for Petitioner. Nina Ren, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1
On October 25, 2022, Sandra Mehl filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) resulting from a tetanus diphtheria acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine received on June 10, 2020. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed December 9, 2024, at ¶¶ 2-4; Ex. 7 at 14. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered in the United States, she has suffered residual effects for longer than six months, and neither Petitioner, nor any other party, has ever filed any other action or received compensation in the form of an award or settlement for Petitioner’s vaccine-related injury. Petition at ¶¶ 5, 28, 31, 32; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the Tdap vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury or any other injury; and denies that petitioner’s current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.
1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).
Nevertheless, on December 9, 2024, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:
A lump sum of $15,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.
I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
SANDRA MEHL,
Petitioner, No. 22-1586V Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran v. ECF
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
STIPULATION
The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:
I . Sandra Mehl ("petitioner'') filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 {the "Vaccine Program''). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt of a tetanus-containing ("Tdap.,) vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the ''Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a)
2. Petitioner received a Tdap vaccine on June 10, 2020. 1 3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.
1 On January 11, 2021, January 29, 2021, October 1, 2021, and July 18, 2022, petitioner also
received SARS-COV-2 vaccinations. Vaccines against COVJD-19 are not contained in the Vaccine Injury Table. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l4 and 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a). Pursuant to the declaration issued by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 247d-6d, 247d-6e), claims for alleged injuries from COVID-19 countermeasures, including vaccines, may be compensable under the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program ("CICP"). See 85 Fed. Reg. 15198, 15202 (March 17, 2020).
ENV80581643-2947-DEAE-8649-8AAF 12/03/2024 21 :28 PM l/TC 4. Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA") that was caused-in-fact by the Tdap vaccine. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of the alleged injury for more than six months.
5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on petitioner's behalf as a result of the alleged injury.
6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the Tdap vaccine caused petitioner's alleged shoulder injury or any other injury; and denies that petitioner's current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.
7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.
8. As soon as practicable after an entry ofjudgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:
A lump sum of $15,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
9. As soon as practicable after the entry ofjudgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition.
2
ENV80581643-2947-DEAE-8649-BAAF 12/03/2024 21 :28 PM UTC 10. Petitioner and petitioner's attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.
11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mehl v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Mehl v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.