Mehaylo v. Great Northern Paper Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Mehaylo v. Great Northern Paper Co.

82 A. 1133, 108 Me. 573, 1912 Me. LEXIS 38

DecidedApril 16, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 82 A. 1133 (Mehaylo v. Great Northern Paper Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mehaylo v. Great Northern Paper Co., 82 A. 1133, 108 Me. 573, 1912 Me. LEXIS 38 (Me. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by the plaintiff as administrator of the estate of John Hreha, deceased intestate, to recover damage for an injury received by the deceased November 26, 1907, while employed by the defendant company in its pulp mill at Madison, Maine, resulting in his death three days later. In the first trial of this action the verdict was for the plaintiff for $4,750. This verdict was set aside by the Law Court. See Mehaylo, Admr., v. The Great Northern Paper Company, 107 Maine, 521. At the second trial of the action the verdict was for the plaintiff for $6,958.33. The defendant excepted to several rulings and also filed a general motion for a new trial. Exceptions not considered.

Motion sustained and verdict set. aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by the plaintiff as administrator of the estate of John Hreha, deceased intestate, to recover damage for an injury received by the deceased November 26, 1907, while employed by the defendant company in its pulp mill at Madison, Maine, resulting in his death three days later. In the first trial of this action the verdict was for the plaintiff for $4,750. This verdict was set aside by the Law Court. See Mehaylo, Admr., v. The Great Northern Paper Company, 107 Maine, 521. At the second trial of the action the verdict was for the plaintiff for $6,958.33. The defendant excepted to several rulings and also filed a general motion for a new trial. Exceptions not considered.

Motion sustained and verdict set. aside.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A. 1133, 108 Me. 573, 1912 Me. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mehaylo-v-great-northern-paper-co-me-1912.