Megura v. Fredericks, No. Cv90 03 13 45s (Sep. 17, 1992)

Connecticut Superior Court

Megura v. Fredericks, No. Cv90 03 13 45s (Sep. 17, 1992)

1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 8718

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided September 17, 1992·No. No. CV90 03 13 45S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT After pleadings have been closed, a Motion for Summary Judgment is a proper way to test the legal sufficiency of a complaint. Boucher Agency, Inc. v. Zimmer, 106 Conn. 404, 409.

Defendant's motion is granted and the clerk is ordered to enter that order unless the plaintiff moves to amend the complaint in separate counts setting forth factual allegations to respectively support the plaintiff's claims of negligent and reckless conduct on the part of the defendant by October 6, 1992.

Flynn, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT After pleadings have been closed, a Motion for Summary Judgment is a proper way to test the legal sufficiency of a complaint. Boucher Agency, Inc. v. Zimmer, 106 Conn. 404, 409.

Defendant's motion is granted and the clerk is ordered to enter that order unless the plaintiff moves to amend the complaint in separate counts setting forth factual allegations to respectively support the plaintiff's claims of negligent and reckless conduct on the part of the defendant by October 6, 1992.

Flynn, J.

Megura v. Fredericks, No. Cv90 03 13 45s (Sep. 17, 1992), 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 8718 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 8718 (Megura v. Fredericks, No. Cv90 03 13 45s (Sep. 17, 1992)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related