Megnin v. Smith & Leo, Inc.

241 A.D. 671

This text of 241 A.D. 671 (Megnin v. Smith & Leo, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Megnin v. Smith & Leo, Inc., 241 A.D. 671 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

There was no statutory duty on the defendant general contractor to furnish a scaffold for the bricklayers and there is no proof of any affirmative negligence on the part of the general contractor. The complaint as to it should have been dismissed. Judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendant Tobin & McKenna, Inc., affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff. Judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant Smith & Leo, Inc., reversed, with costs to said defendant against plaintiff, and complaint dismissed as to said defendant, with costs. Order appealed from affirmed. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.D. 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/megnin-v-smith-leo-inc-nyappdiv-1934.