Meghan Nichole Fromme v. Matthew Cody Johnson

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 5, 2026·No. 5D2025-2660·Published

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 5D2025-2660 LT Case No. 16-2025-DR-000763-A _____________________________

MEGHAN NICHOLE FROMME,

Appellant,

v.

MATTHEW CODY JOHNSON,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Eric Roberson, Judge.

Meghan Nichole Fromme, Goliad, TX, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

June 5, 2026

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Klein v. Manville, 363 So. 3d 1163, 1169 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023) (observing that section 784.048(2), Florida Statutes, does not require that a petitioner prove that a respondent has “repeatedly stalked” them, just that the respondent has followed, harassed, or cyberstalked them “repeatedly” because nowhere in the statutory definition “is stalking defined as a multiple of itself” (quoting Pickett v. Copeland, 236 So. 3d 1142, 1145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018))). LAMBERT, EDWARDS, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meghan Nichole Fromme v. Matthew Cody Johnson, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Meghan Nichole Fromme v. Matthew Cody Johnson (Meghan Nichole Fromme v. Matthew Cody Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pickett v. Copeland
236 So. 3d 1142 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)