Meghan Nichole Fromme v. Matthew Cody Johnson
This text of Meghan Nichole Fromme v. Matthew Cody Johnson (Meghan Nichole Fromme v. Matthew Cody Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 5D2025-2660 LT Case No. 16-2025-DR-000763-A _____________________________
MEGHAN NICHOLE FROMME,
Appellant,
v.
MATTHEW CODY JOHNSON,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Eric Roberson, Judge.
Meghan Nichole Fromme, Goliad, TX, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
June 5, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Klein v. Manville, 363 So. 3d 1163, 1169 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023) (observing that section 784.048(2), Florida Statutes, does not require that a petitioner prove that a respondent has “repeatedly stalked” them, just that the respondent has followed, harassed, or cyberstalked them “repeatedly” because nowhere in the statutory definition “is stalking defined as a multiple of itself” (quoting Pickett v. Copeland, 236 So. 3d 1142, 1145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018))). LAMBERT, EDWARDS, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Meghan Nichole Fromme v. Matthew Cody Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meghan-nichole-fromme-v-matthew-cody-johnson-fladistctapp-2026.