Meghan Grant v. Joshua Finecy, Anthony Long, and Kyle Randle
This text of Meghan Grant v. Joshua Finecy, Anthony Long, and Kyle Randle (Meghan Grant v. Joshua Finecy, Anthony Long, and Kyle Randle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-23-00310-CV
MEGHAN GRANT, Appellant § On Appeal from the 48th District Court
V. § of Tarrant County (048-342682-23)
§ December 28, 2023
JOSHUA FINECY, ANTHONY LONG, § Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack AND KYLE RANDLE, Appellees
JUDGMENT
This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there
was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the trial court’s order denying
Appellant’s motion to dismiss is affirmed and this matter is remanded for further
proceedings.
It is further ordered that Appellant Meghan Grant shall bear the costs of this
appeal, for which let execution issue. SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
By /s/ Dana Womack Justice Dana Womack
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Meghan Grant v. Joshua Finecy, Anthony Long, and Kyle Randle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meghan-grant-v-joshua-finecy-anthony-long-and-kyle-randle-texapp-2023.