Meggs v. Knowlin

466 F. App'x 260
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 16, 2012·No. No. 11-6994·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy D. Meggs, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Ac[261]*261cordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Meggs v. Knowlin, No. 8:10-cv-01774-TLW, 2011 WL 2729193 (D.S.C. filed July 12, 2011, entered July 13, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meggs v. Knowlin, 466 F. App'x 260 (4th Cir. 2012).

466 F. App'x 260 (Meggs v. Knowlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related