Megginson v. The City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided May 9, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-06798·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MICHAEL E. MEGGINSON, Plaintiff, ORDER — against — 23-cv-06798 (ER) CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.

Ramos, D.J.: Defendants’ request to stay discovery (Doc. 22 at 9) is GRANTED. Defendants’ motion presents substantial arguments for dismissal, and a stay would not unfairly prejudice Megginson. See, e.g., HAHA Glob., Inc. v. Barclays, No. 19 Civ. 04749 (VEC) (SDA), 2020 WL 832341, at *1 (S.D.N_Y. Feb. 20, 2020). Accordingly, discovery in this matter shall be stayed pending resolution of Defendants’ motion to dismiss. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to provide a copy of this order to Megginson.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 9, 2024 ye New York, New York a \ Dun EDGARDO RAMOS, U.S.D.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Megginson v. The City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Megginson v. The City of New York (Megginson v. The City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.