Megginson v. Bailey

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Megginson v. Bailey

1916 OK CR 102, 153 P. 1165, 12 Okla. Crim. 606, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 108

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 15, 1916

DocketNo. A-2628.

StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK CR 102 (Megginson v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Megginson v. Bailey, 1916 OK CR 102, 153 P. 1165, 12 Okla. Crim. 606, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 108 (Okla. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner being' prosecuted in the county court of Hughes county in three separate eases on informations charging violations of the prohibitory law, filed application in said county, court for a change of judge, alleging in substance that respondent, J. Boss Bailey was so biased and prejudiced against petitioner that petitioner could not have a fair and impartial trial before said judge. Which application was supported by certain affidavits, and said respondent was requested to certify to such disqualification and refused.

Notice was duty given that an application would be made to this court for a writ of Mandamus to require said respondent to disqualify and grant a change of judge in said eases. The parties appeared and respondent filed a demurrer to the petition. Upon the consideration of the record, it is adjudged that the demurrer be sustained and the writ denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner being' prosecuted in the county court of Hughes county in three separate eases on informations charging violations of the prohibitory law, filed application in said county, court for a change of judge, alleging in substance that respondent, J. Boss Bailey was so biased and prejudiced against petitioner that petitioner could not have a fair and impartial trial before said judge. Which application was supported by certain affidavits, and said respondent was requested to certify to such disqualification and refused.

Notice was duty given that an application would be made to this court for a writ of Mandamus to require said respondent to disqualify and grant a change of judge in said eases. The parties appeared and respondent filed a demurrer to the petition. Upon the consideration of the record, it is adjudged that the demurrer be sustained and the writ denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1916 OK CR 102, 153 P. 1165, 12 Okla. Crim. 606, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/megginson-v-bailey-oklacrimapp-1916.