Mefford v. Warden

221 A.2d 906, 243 Md. 696, 1966 Md. LEXIS 581
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJuly 26, 1966
Docket[App. No. 108, September Term, 1965.]
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 221 A.2d 906 (Mefford v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mefford v. Warden, 221 A.2d 906, 243 Md. 696, 1966 Md. LEXIS 581 (Md. 1966).

Opinion

243 Md. 696 (1966)
221 A.2d 906

MEFFORD
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 108, September Term, 1965.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided July 26, 1966.

Before the entire Court.

PER CURIAM:

This application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief by Judge Menchine arises out of facts set forth in elaborate detail in Mefford v. State, 235 Md. 497, 201 A.2d 824 (1964). Petitioner contends that he was denied due process in his original trial by a combination of the inexperience of assigned counsel and the prosecuting attitude of the trial judge. Judge Menchine made an express finding that petitioner's counsel had "carried out his duties in the defense of the Petitioner with competence and vigor." He also found that the trial judge's participation in the trial "did not in any sense constitute judicial impropriety." We find in the record ample support for these findings.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frederick Mefford v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
413 F.2d 439 (Fourth Circuit, 1969)
Blackburn v. Copinger
300 F. Supp. 1127 (D. Maryland, 1969)
Mefford v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
270 F. Supp. 745 (D. Maryland, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 A.2d 906, 243 Md. 696, 1966 Md. LEXIS 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mefford-v-warden-md-1966.