Mefford v. Warden

221 A.2d 906, 243 Md. 696, 1966 Md. LEXIS 581
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided July 26, 1966·No. [App. No. 108, September Term, 1965.]·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

243 Md. 696 (1966)
221 A.2d 906

MEFFORD
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 108, September Term, 1965.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided July 26, 1966.

Before the entire Court.

PER CURIAM:

This application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief by Judge Menchine arises out of facts set forth in elaborate detail in Mefford v. State, 235 Md. 497, 201 A.2d 824 (1964). Petitioner contends that he was denied due process in his original trial by a combination of the inexperience of assigned counsel and the prosecuting attitude of the trial judge. Judge Menchine made an express finding that petitioner's counsel had "carried out his duties in the defense of the Petitioner with competence and vigor." He also found that the trial judge's participation in the trial "did not in any sense constitute judicial impropriety." We find in the record ample support for these findings.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mefford v. Warden, 221 A.2d 906, 243 Md. 696, 1966 Md. LEXIS 581 (Md. 1966).

221 A.2d 906 (Mefford v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frederick Mefford v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
413 F.2d 439 (Fourth Circuit, 1969)
Blackburn v. Copinger
300 F. Supp. 1127 (D. Maryland, 1969)
Mefford v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
270 F. Supp. 745 (D. Maryland, 1967)