Meetings of Insurance Companies' Shareholders

28 Pa. D. & C.2d 556
CourtPennsylvania Department of Justice
DecidedDecember 5, 1962
StatusPublished

This text of 28 Pa. D. & C.2d 556 (Meetings of Insurance Companies' Shareholders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Department of Justice primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meetings of Insurance Companies' Shareholders, 28 Pa. D. & C.2d 556 (Pa. 1962).

Opinion

Antoun, Deputy Attorney General, and Stahl, Attorney General,

We have your request for an opinion as to whether insurance companies incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania may, in the absence of specific statutory authority, hold meetings of stockholders in the case of stock companies, or members in the case of mutual companies, outside the physical boundaries of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. You specifically raise the following questions:

1. Must the annual and special meetings of stockholders or members of domestic stock and mutual insurance companies pursuant to article III of the Insurance Company Law of May 17,1921, 40 PS §421 et seq., be held within the boundaries of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania?

[557]*5572. Assuming that such meetings must be held within the boundaries of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, must they be held in the city set forth in the insurance company’s charter as the location of its principal office?

Section 304 of the Insurance Company Law of May 17,1921, P. L. 682, as amended, 40 PS §424, provides as follows:

“The annual meeting for the election of directors or trustees of any insurance company shall be held at such time on or before the first day of May as the bylaws of the company may direct; of the time and place of which meeting at least thirty days’ previous notice shall be given to the stockholders, or, in the case of a mutual company, to the members, by publication not less than three times in at least two daily or weekly newspapers, and in the legal periodical, if any, designated by the rules of court of the proper county for the publication of legal notices, published in the city or county wherein the company is domiciled.”

You will note that section 304 is completely silent as to the place where an annual meeting must be held. The various provisions in the Insurance Company Law of 1921 for special meetings are equally silent as to place of meeting.

At common law, meetings of shareholders of corporations had to be held within the boundaries of the State which created the corporation in the absence of express statutory authority permitting such meetings to be held elsewhere: Fletcher Cyclopedia Corporations, Vol. 5, §2002-3; 13 Am. Jur., Corporations, §474,

Pennsylvania appears to have accepted the general rule in Derry Council, etc. v. State Council of Pennsylvania, etc., 197 Pa. 413, 416, 47 Atl. 208 (1900), where the court said:

“It is true, as a general proposition, that a corporation can have no legal existence beyond the bounds of [558]*558the sovereignty that gave it life, and must dwell within the place of its creation: Ohio & Miss. R.R. Co. v. Wheeler, 1 Black 286; County of Allegheny v. Cleveland & Pittsburgh R.R. Co., 51 Pa. 228; Commonwealth v. Standard Oil Co., 101 Pa. 119. It is equally true, as a general rule, that, as the corporation cannot exist beyond the limits of the sovereignty from which it springs, its strictly corporate acts must be performed within such limits: Miller v. Ewer, 27 Me. 509; Smith v. Silver Valley Mining Co., 64 Md. 85; Green’s Brice’s Ultra Vires, p. 442, note a; Thompson on Corporations, sec. 694 ...”

The court in discussing the policy of the rule stated that it was designed to protect shareholders from hardship and fraud.

Other jurisdictions have likewise adopted the rule that meetings of shareholders are to be held within the boundaries of the state of incorporation: Harding v. American Glucose Company, 182 Ill. 551, 55 N.E. 577 (1899); Hening and Hagedorn v. Glanton, 27 Ga. App. 339,108 S.E. 256 (1921).

Turning to Pennsylvania corporate law, we find that section 501, subsec. A, of the Business Corporation Law of May 5, 1933, P. L. 364, as amended, 15 PS §2852-501, specifically permits the meetings of shareholders of a business corporation to be held outside the Commonwealth. However, this act does not apply to any corporation which is subject to the supervision of the Insurance Department: Act of May 5, 1933, P. L. 364, sec. 4, subsec. 3, as amended, 15 PS §2852-4(3).

Thus, although the Legislature has seen fit to depart from the general common law rule with regard to business corporations, it has not indicated an intention to do so with respect to insurance companies organized under the Insurance Company Law.

Section 304 of the Insurance Company Law, while not providing for the place where annual meetings [559]*559must be held, does make provision for notice of such meetings. The section provides that notice of the place of the meeting is to be published in the county wherein the company is domiciled. As we are concerned with domestic insurance companies and as the notice of meeting must be published in the county wherein the company is domiciled, it could be maintained that this is some legislative indication that the place of the meeting should be the place of the notice.1

It is our opinion, therefore, that annual and special meetings of shareholders or members of domestic stock and mutual2 insurance companies must be held within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

With regard to the actual situs of meetings, section 328 of the Insurance Company Law of 1921, footnote 1, supra, provides that meetings of shareholders for the purpose of reducing capital stock shall be held at the company’s chief office or place of business. No provision is made with regard to the actual situs of annual or other special meetings of shareholders.

It would seem that the situs of such meetings should be the place set forth in the Articles of Agreement pursuant to section 203 of the Insurance Company Law of May 17, 1921, P. L. 682, as amended, 40 PS §383, which provides:

[560]*560“. . . agreement shall specify ... (d) The place in which it is to be established or located...”

The place of business or location of the company is where the corporate functions are to be performed, the stockholders hold their elections, and the directors manage and direct the business of the corporation: In Re Mann Mining Company of North Carolina, 2 Chester 90 (1877); Fletcher Cyclopedia Corporation, Vol. 5, §2001.

It is our opinion, therefore, and you are advised accordingly that:

1. Annual and special meetings of stockholders or members of domestic stock and mutual insurance companies must be held within the boundaries of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

2. Such meetings are to be held in the city set forth in the insurance company’s Articles of Agreement as the location of its principal office.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. Wheeler
66 U.S. 286 (Supreme Court, 1862)
Miller v. Ewer
27 Me. 509 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1847)
Hening & Hagedorn v. Glanton
108 S.E. 256 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
County of Allegheny v. Cleveland & Pittsburgh Railroad
51 Pa. 228 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1866)
Commonwealth v. Standard Oil Co.
101 Pa. 119 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1882)
Derry Council No. 40 v. State Council
47 A. 208 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)
Harding v. American Glucose Co.
64 L.R.A. 738 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1899)
Smith v. Silver Valley Mining Co.
20 A. 1032 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Pa. D. & C.2d 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meetings-of-insurance-companies-shareholders-padeptjust-1962.