Meenan v. Newman
662 So. 2d 1320, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11425, 1995 WL 638288
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 1, 1995·No. No. 95-1887·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The order of reference to a special master without consent of opposing parties was explicitly contrary to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490(c). For this reason, prohibition is granted so as to prevent respondents from further enforcing the order of reference. Moreover, we grant mandamus to compel the respondent to hear and determine the matters encompassed in the order of reference. Rosen v. Solomon, 586 So.2d 1348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). We assume issuance of a formal writ will not be necessary.
Relief awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meenan v. Newman, 662 So. 2d 1320, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11425, 1995 WL 638288 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
662 So. 2d 1320 (Meenan v. Newman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rosenberg v. Morales
804 So. 2d 622 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Daniels v. Florida Public Employees Council 79
732 So. 2d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)