Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Meenan v. Newman

Meenan v. Newman

662 So. 2d 1320, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11425, 1995 WL 638288
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 1, 1995
DocketNo. 95-1887
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 662 So. 2d 1320 (Meenan v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meenan v. Newman, 662 So. 2d 1320, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11425, 1995 WL 638288 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order of reference to a special master without consent of opposing parties was explicitly contrary to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490(c). For this reason, prohibition is granted so as to prevent respondents from further enforcing the order of reference. Moreover, we grant mandamus to compel the respondent to hear and determine the matters encompassed in the order of reference. Rosen v. Solomon, 586 So.2d 1348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). We assume issuance of a formal writ will not be necessary.

Relief awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosenberg v. Morales
804 So. 2d 622 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Daniels v. Florida Public Employees Council 79
732 So. 2d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
662 So. 2d 1320, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11425, 1995 WL 638288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meenan-v-newman-fladistctapp-1995.