Meeks v. Travelers Insurance Company

167 S.E.2d 927, 119 Ga. App. 569, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1170
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 23, 1969·No. 44382·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Pannell, Judge.

“Under the provisions of § 114-712, as amended, whether or not the employer had defended the action without reasonable ground was an issue of fact for determination by the State Board of. Workmen’s Compensation.” Wilson v. Maryland Cas. Co., 71 Ga. App. 184, 191 (30 SE2d 420). The evidence adduced on the hearing here was sufficient to authorize the Board of Workmen’s Compensation to find that the insurer had not defended the action without reasonable grounds. The judgment of the superior court affirming the award of the Board of Workmen’s Compensation is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meeks v. Travelers Insurance Company, 167 S.E.2d 927, 119 Ga. App. 569, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1170 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969).

167 S.E.2d 927 (Meeks v. Travelers Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tommy Nobis Center v. Barfield
370 S.E.2d 517 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
American Motorist Insurance v. Corbett
242 S.E.2d 748 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Pacific Employers Insurance v. Peck
200 S.E.2d 151 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
McCoy v. J. D. Jewell, Inc.
179 S.E.2d 654 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)