Meeks v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Meeks v. State

13 S.E. 556, 87 Ga. 331, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 162

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 27, 1891·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

The bill of exceptions in this case having been served upon counsel employed to assist the solicitor-general, and not [332] upon the latter, as the law requires, the writ of error is dismissed. Code, §4261 ; Oliver v. State, 66 Ga. 243. Writ of error dismissed.

May 27, 1891. C. D. Phillips, O. D. McGregor and G. P. Roberts, for plaintiff in error. A. Richardson, solicitor-general, by brief, and Thompson & Spinks, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lumpkin, J.

The bill of exceptions in this case having been served upon counsel employed to assist the solicitor-general, and not [332] upon the latter, as the law requires, the writ of error is dismissed. Code, §4261 ; Oliver v. State, 66 Ga. 243. Writ of error dismissed.

May 27, 1891. C. D. Phillips, O. D. McGregor and G. P. Roberts, for plaintiff in error. A. Richardson, solicitor-general, by brief, and Thompson & Spinks, contra.

Meeks v. State, 13 S.E. 556, 87 Ga. 331, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 162 (Ga. 1891).

Pincite

13 S.E. 556 (Meeks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related