Meeks v. State
57 Ga. 329
Opinion
We have subjected this record to a careful and thorough scrutiny, and have been unable to discover in it any good reason for granting the prisoner a new trial. He appears to. have been legally convicted, after a full and fair trial, upon evidence not only warranting, but absolutely requiring the verdict. For a sufficiently elaborate presentation of the legaL points ruled by the court, I refer to the head-notes.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meeks v. State, 57 Ga. 329 (Ga. 1876).
57 Ga. 329 (Meeks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Danner
226 P. 475 (Montana Supreme Court, 1924)
Ivey v. State
113 S.E. 175 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Holland v. State
95 S.E. 538 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Howey v. State
1913 OK CR 129 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1913)
Manning v. State
76 S.E. 70 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Lewis v. State
59 S.E. 782 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Jordan v. State
46 S.E. 679 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Brown v. State
31 S.E. 557 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
State v. Pickett
39 L.R.A. 302 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1897)
Faville v. Shehan
26 N.W. 131 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1885)
Savannah, Florida & Western Railway v. Harper
70 Ga. 119 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1883)
Hill v. State
64 Ga. 453 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1880)
Shaw v. State
60 Ga. 246 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1878)
State v. Easter
30 Ohio St. (N.S.) 542 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1876)