Meeks v. State Beverage Department

89 So. 2d 493
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 12, 1956
StatusPublished

This text of 89 So. 2d 493 (Meeks v. State Beverage Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meeks v. State Beverage Department, 89 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This .cause came on to be heard on the motion of the appellee to affirm- the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is [494]*494appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the decree appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 So. 2d 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meeks-v-state-beverage-department-fla-1956.