Meeks at al. v. Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California·Decided February 13, 2023·No. 3:21-cv-03266·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELETTRA MEEKS, et al., Case No. 21-cv-03266-VC Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. COMPEL ARBITRATION EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants.

Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision, Experian’s motion to compel arbitration is granted. Dkt. Nos. 104, 105. The plaintiffs’ claims against Experian are dismissed without prejudice. See Johnmohammadi v. Bloomingdale's, Inc., 755 F.3d 1072, 1073-74 (9th Cir. 2014). The Clerk is directed to update the case caption to Meeks at al. v. Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc. et al. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 13, 2023 = VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meeks at al. v. Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc., (N.D. Cal. 2023).

Meeks at al. v. Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc. (Meeks at al. v. Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fatemeh Johnmohammadi v. Bloomingdale's, Inc.
755 F.3d 1072 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)