Meeker v. Oramam Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meeker v. Oramam Realty Corp.

254 A.D. 563, 2 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6573

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 1938

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 254 A.D. 563 (Meeker v. Oramam Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meeker v. Oramam Realty Corp., 254 A.D. 563, 2 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6573 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

On appeal by defendant from an order striking out its answer and directing judgment against it, and from the judgment entered thereon, in an action by the receiver of a national bank to enforce a stockholder’s individual liability, order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The Comptroller of the Currency had discretionary power to grant such time as he deemed proper for the payment of the assessment. (Kennedy v. Gibson, 75 U. S. [8 Wall.] 498, 505; Strasburger v. Schram, 93 F. [2d] 246; United States Nat, Bank of La Grande v. Pole, 2 F. Supp. 153, 157.) The cause of action did not accrue until default was made on the last day fixed for payment. (Cary v. Koerner, 200 N. Y. 253, 259.) Under the relevant Statute of Limitations (Civ. Prae. Act, § 49, subd. 4) the action was commenced within time. Present — Lazanslty, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ. [163 Misc. 702.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On appeal by defendant from an order striking out its answer and directing judgment against it, and from the judgment entered thereon, in an action by the receiver of a national bank to enforce a stockholder’s individual liability, order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The Comptroller of the Currency had discretionary power to grant such time as he deemed proper for the payment of the assessment. (Kennedy v. Gibson, 75 U. S. [8 Wall.] 498, 505; Strasburger v. Schram, 93 F. [2d] 246; United States Nat, Bank of La Grande v. Pole, 2 F. Supp. 153, 157.) The cause of action did not accrue until default was made on the last day fixed for payment. (Cary v. Koerner, 200 N. Y. 253, 259.) Under the relevant Statute of Limitations (Civ. Prae. Act, § 49, subd. 4) the action was commenced within time. Present — Lazanslty, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ. [163 Misc. 702.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 563, 2 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meeker-v-oramam-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack