Meeker v. Forbes
98 A. 1086, 86 N.J. Eq. 255, 1 Stock. 255, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 453
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams — 12.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meeker v. Forbes, 98 A. 1086, 86 N.J. Eq. 255, 1 Stock. 255, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 453 (N.J. 1916).
98 A. 1086 (Meeker v. Forbes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Estate of Pistor
154 A.2d 721 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1959)
In Re Pistor
146 A.2d 685 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
Camden Trust Co. v. Matlock
4 A.2d 502 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)
White v. Willever
165 A. 863 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1933)
Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Bond
141 A. 574 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1928)
Traverso v. Traverso
133 A. 705 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)
Skinner v. Boyd
130 A. 22 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)
Scott v. Gamble
9 N.J. Eq. 218 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1852)