Meek v. Virgin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Meek v. Virgin

224 S.W.3d 109, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 516, 2007 WL 898194

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 27, 2007

DocketED 87637

StatusPublished

This text of 224 S.W.3d 109 (Meek v. Virgin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meek v. Virgin, 224 S.W.3d 109, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 516, 2007 WL 898194 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Craig S. Virgin (“Father”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, granting Respondent Janet E. Meek’s (“Mother”) request to relocate their minor child (“A.V.”) with her to Indiana. The trial court found that Mother requested relocation in good faith and that relocation was in the child’s best interests. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Craig S. Virgin (“Father”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, granting Respondent Janet E. Meek’s (“Mother”) request to relocate their minor child (“A.V.”) with her to Indiana. The trial court found that Mother requested relocation in good faith and that relocation was in the child’s best interests. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 S.W.3d 109, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 516, 2007 WL 898194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meek-v-virgin-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack