Meek v. Virgin

224 S.W.3d 109, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 516, 2007 WL 898194
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 27, 2007·No. ED 87637·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Craig S. Virgin (“Father”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, granting Respondent Janet E. Meek’s (“Mother”) request to relocate their minor child (“A.V.”) with her to Indiana. The trial court found that Mother requested relocation in good faith and that relocation was in the child’s best interests. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meek v. Virgin, 224 S.W.3d 109, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 516, 2007 WL 898194 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

224 S.W.3d 109 (Meek v. Virgin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bonney v. Environmental Engineering, Inc.
224 S.W.3d 109 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)