Meek v. Metropolitan Street-railway Co.
This text of 91 P. 681 (Meek v. Metropolitan Street-railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was brought by John G. Meek to recover damages from the Metropolitan Street-railway Company for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him while riding in a street-car of defendant. The car, running at a speed of about three miles an hour, ran into one just ahead of it going in the same direction, and plaintiff claims that the resulting jar injured his back and kidneys.
Under the testimony there was a fair question of fact as to whether he was really hurt by the collision, and it was settled by a verdict in favor of the defendant.
The inquiry as to the plaintiff’s ability to give bond for costs, about which complaint is made, could not have been prejudicial, especially after the full examination on the same subject which had been previously made by both parties.
The hypothetical questions objected to were properly allowed. (Commercial Travelers v. Barnes, 75 Kan. 720, 90 Pac. 293.)
No error was committed in excluding the question propounded to plaintiff: whether the conductor asked him to write his name on a slip of paper; nor do we find any good reason to complain of the rulings of the court in instructing the jury.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 P. 681, 77 Kan. 842, 1907 Kan. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meek-v-metropolitan-street-railway-co-kan-1907.