Meek v. Meek
338 S.W.2d 398
Opinion
William R. Meek moved for modification of a judgment concerning the maintenance and custody of infant children. The trial judge made minor modifications but overruled the major portion of the motion. He appeals.
Upon examination of the record we find that the trial judge has not abused his discretion and we therefore decline to disturb his findings. Petrie v. Petrie, Ky., 262 S.W.2d 182; Wilkey v. Glisson, Ky., 303 S.W.2d 266.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meek v. Meek, 338 S.W.2d 398 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960).
338 S.W.2d 398 (Meek v. Meek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Spurlin v. Spurlin
456 S.W.2d 683 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1970)
DeSimone v. DeSimone
392 S.W.2d 68 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1965)
Somerville v. Somerville
339 S.W.2d 940 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1960)