Meek v. Meek

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Meek v. Meek

338 S.W.2d 398

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

DecidedSeptember 16, 1960

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 338 S.W.2d 398 (Meek v. Meek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meek v. Meek, 338 S.W.2d 398 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

BIRD, Chief Justice.

William R. Meek moved for modification of a judgment concerning the maintenance and custody of infant children. The trial judge made minor modifications but overruled the major portion of the motion. He appeals.

Upon examination of the record we find that the trial judge has not abused his discretion and we therefore decline to disturb his findings. Petrie v. Petrie, Ky., 262 S.W.2d 182; Wilkey v. Glisson, Ky., 303 S.W.2d 266.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BIRD, Chief Justice.

William R. Meek moved for modification of a judgment concerning the maintenance and custody of infant children. The trial judge made minor modifications but overruled the major portion of the motion. He appeals.

Upon examination of the record we find that the trial judge has not abused his discretion and we therefore decline to disturb his findings. Petrie v. Petrie, Ky., 262 S.W.2d 182; Wilkey v. Glisson, Ky., 303 S.W.2d 266.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

338 S.W.2d 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meek-v-meek-kyctapp-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack