Meehan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Meehan v. State

201 So. 3d 128, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14472

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 30, 2015·No. No. 3D14-489·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Gonzalez v. State, 136 So.3d 1125, 1147 (Fla.2014) (holding that under invited error doctrine, defendant may not make or invite error during trial and seek to take advantage of such error on appeal, where in response to jury’s request for transcripts of witness testimony, defendant agreed that court should instruct jurors to rely on their own recollections of the witnesses’ testimony.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Gonzalez v. State, 136 So.3d 1125, 1147 (Fla.2014) (holding that under invited error doctrine, defendant may not make or invite error during trial and seek to take advantage of such error on appeal, where in response to jury’s request for transcripts of witness testimony, defendant agreed that court should instruct jurors to rely on their own recollections of the witnesses’ testimony.)

Meehan v. State, 201 So. 3d 128, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14472 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

201 So. 3d 128 (Meehan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related