Meehan v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC

659 F. App'x 437
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 5, 2016·No. No. 14-60078·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

[438] MEMORANDUM **

Michael T. Meehan appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing for lack standing Meehan’s adversary proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(1). We affirm.

In his opening brief, Meehan fails to address how the BAP or the bankruptcy court erred in either ruling. As a result, Meehan has waived his appeal of the dismissal order. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[0]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”); see also Greenwood v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We will not manufacture arguments for an appellant, and a bare assertion does not preserve a claim — ”).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meehan v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, 659 F. App'x 437 (9th Cir. 2016).

659 F. App'x 437 (Meehan v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re: Dr. Roots Herbs, LLC
Ninth Circuit, 2024
Barnes v. Henry
D. Hawaii, 2021
In re: ERIC THOMAS MESI
Ninth Circuit, 2021
Bobka v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.
586 B.R. 470 (S.D. California, 2018)