Meehan v. County Employees' Commission

46 A.2d 383, 134 N.J.L. 154, 1946 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 170
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 1, 1946
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 46 A.2d 383 (Meehan v. County Employees' Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meehan v. County Employees' Commission, 46 A.2d 383, 134 N.J.L. 154, 1946 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 170 (N.J. 1946).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The underlying factual situation appears in the previous decision of this court allowing the writ. 133 N. J. L. 212. The legal question, as there stated, is “whether the intendment of the statute is to provide pensions for county employees who are simply incapacitated to any or some extent by reason, of injury or for such as are incapacitated from performing reasonably the duties of the particular employment which they were hired to perform.” Our conclusion is that the latter alternative is the one contemplated by the statute; (see Simmons v. Policemen's Pension Commission, 111 Id. 134); and consequently the question now to be answered is whether under the conditions existing in this case the loss of one eye has incapacitated this watchman, with one serviceable eye, from performing reasonably his duties under the conditions of his employment. Our answer is in the negative; and this conclusion results in a dismissal of the writ. Such will be the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rainhold Holding Co. v. Freehold Township
14 N.J. Tax 266 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 A.2d 383, 134 N.J.L. 154, 1946 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meehan-v-county-employees-commission-nj-1946.