Meech v. Churchill

New York Supreme Court

Meech v. Churchill

2 Wend. 630

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 15, 1829

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Wend. 630 (Meech v. Churchill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meech v. Churchill, 2 Wend. 630 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court, Savage, Ch. J.

This motion is made under the impression that this case comes within the purview of the act, (Statutes, 4th vol. 280, c.) which allows but one full hill of costs, where several suits are brought on the same instrument or note. The statute does not apply to this case; the suits were not on the same instrument or note. The guaranty is a separate, distinct contract from the note, and the plaintiff is entitled to his full costs. The motion is denied with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court, Savage, Ch. J.

This motion is made under the impression that this case comes within the purview of the act, (Statutes, 4th vol. 280, c.) which allows but one full hill of costs, where several suits are brought on the same instrument or note. The statute does not apply to this case; the suits were not on the same instrument or note. The guaranty is a separate, distinct contract from the note, and the plaintiff is entitled to his full costs. The motion is denied with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Wend. 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meech-v-churchill-nysupct-1829.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack