Meech v. Churchill
2 Wend. 630
Opinion
This motion is made under the impression that this case comes within the purview of the act, (Statutes, 4th vol. 280, c.) which allows but one full hill of costs, where several suits are brought on the same instrument or note. The statute does not apply to this case; the suits were not on the same instrument or note. The guaranty is a separate, distinct contract from the note, and the plaintiff is entitled to his full costs. The motion is denied with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meech v. Churchill, 2 Wend. 630 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).
2 Wend. 630 (Meech v. Churchill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burnham v. Gallentine
11 Ind. 295 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1858)
Miller v. Gaston
2 Hill & Den. 188 (New York Supreme Court, 1842)