Meech v. Calkins
4 Hill & Den. 534
CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
DecidedJune 15, 1842
StatusPublished
This text of 4 Hill & Den. 534 (Meech v. Calkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Meech v. Calkins, 4 Hill & Den. 534 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1842).
Opinion
By the Court,
The defendants may take a rule for a commission ; but they are not entitled to a stay of proceedings, the affidavit being clearly defective.
Ordered accordingly.
See Warner v. Harvey, (9 Wend. 444;) Seymour's executors v. Strong, (19 id. 98;) also ante, p. 64, 5, note, and the cases there cited relating to the form of an affidavit of merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Warner v. Harvey
9 Wend. 444 (New York Supreme Court, 1832)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Hill & Den. 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meech-v-calkins-nycterr-1842.