Meech v. Bennett

1 Hill & Den. 191
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1843
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Hill & Den. 191 (Meech v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meech v. Bennett, 1 Hill & Den. 191 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1843).

Opinion

By the Court,

Nelson, Ch. J.

The contract is illegal and void within established principles; as resulting in a combination to prevent competition at an auction sale, and thus sacrifice the property of the debtor to the prejudice of himself and his other creditors. It is against good morals and sound policy, and can not receive the sanction of a court of justice. The fact that the debtor in this case assented to the agreement does not meet or avoid the evil. The other creditor or creditors, generally, are interested in the question. (Jones v. Caswell, 3 Johns. Cas., 29; Thompson v. Davies, 13 Johns., 112.)

Judgment for the defendant on demurrer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. Davies
13 Johns. 112 (New York Supreme Court, 1816)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Hill & Den. 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meech-v-bennett-nysupct-1843.