Meece v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedJuly 25, 2025
Docket23-2006V
StatusUnpublished

This text of Meece v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Meece v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meece v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2025).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-2006V

DOUG MEECE, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: April 7, 2025 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Bobbie L. Flynt, Crandall & Pera Law, LLC., Chagrin Falls, OH, for Petitioner.

Jay Travis Williamson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

On November 17, 2023, Doug Meece filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on December 2, 2022. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed at April 1, 2025, ¶¶ 1, 2. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered within the United States, that he sustained an injury within the time period set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table or that his injury was caused in fact by the vaccination, and that he experienced the residual effects of his condition for more than six months. Petition at 1-2, 5; Stipulation at ¶¶ 4. Respondent denies that Petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the vaccine caused Petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury; and denies that his current condition is a sequalae of a vaccine-related injury. Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Nevertheless, on April 1, 2025, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, 3 stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $65,000.00, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 The docusign Certificate of Completion located at page six of the parties’ Stipulation has been omitted from the attached copy of the Stipulation. 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 Docusign Envelope ID: E132F83B-6C1 B-4E82-B3B6-F21AA7 A8086B

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

DOUG MEECE,

Petitioner,

V. No. 23-2006 Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES,

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Doug Meece ("petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine compensation under tht

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the "Vaccne

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of an influenza ("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

"Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a)

2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on December 2, 2022.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that he sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine adm 1 - Jtration

("SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the Table, or in the alternative, that his all -. ged

shoulder injury was in fact caused by the vaccine. He further alleges that he experiencer: the

residual effects of this condition for more than six months. Docusign Envelope ID: E132F83B-6C1 B-4E82-B3B6-F21 AA7 A8086B

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for •damages on his behalf as a result of his alleged injury.

6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies th2t the

vaccine caused petitioner's alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury; and denies that his

current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consi ~1,.: nt with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compen:;ation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21 (a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services wi ll issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $65,000.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner's counsel's IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l 5(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceediwt~ before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding 1,iJOn this

petition.

10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300a

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l)
§ 300aa-2l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l)
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Meece v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meece-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2025.