Mee v. Peterson
This text of 273 A.3d 365 (Mee v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case No. 24-C-18-002976 Argued: April 5, 2022
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF MARYLAND
No. 50
September Term, 2021
CHRISTOPHER W. MEE, et al.
v.
ROBERT PETERSON, et al.
Getty, C.J., Watts Hotten Booth Biran Raker, Irma S. (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned) McDonald, Robert N. (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned), JJ.
PER CURIAM ORDER
Filed: April 12, 2022 Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2022-04-12 12:02-04:00
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk CHRISTOPHER W. MEE, et al. * IN THE
* COURT OF APPEALS
* OF MARYLAND v. * COA-REG-0050-2021
* No. 50
ROBERT PETERSON, et al. * September Term, 2021
The petition for writ of certiorari in the above-captioned case having been granted
and argued, it is this 12th day of April, 2022,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and
it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.
/s/ Joseph M. Getty Chief Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.3d 365, 478 Md. 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mee-v-peterson-md-2022.