Mee v. County Treasurer
This text of 1 McGrath 1445 (Mee v. County Treasurer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To compel payment of certain orders granted by the board of supervisors while sitting at Frankfort, after the county seat had been removed from that place to Benzonia.
Denied June 3, 1879.
It appeared that the board had assumed to recanvass the vote by which the county seat was removed, and had declared the county seat to be at Frankfort.
Held, that the county seat could not be shifted at the will of the supervisors, after they had once canvassed the vote for its removal, and located it in accordance with the result. Attorney General vs. Supervisors (Lake), 33 At., 289; Attorney General vs. Supervisors (Benzie), 34 M., 211 (1607).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 1445, 41 McGrath 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mee-v-county-treasurer-mich-1879.