Medwin v. Graf
This text of 254 A.D. 823 (Medwin v. Graf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the refusal of the court to admit in evidence the provision of the Building Code of the "City of Rochester requiring a handrail on the stairway was substantial error. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant in an action for damages for injuries sustained by reason of falling on a stairway in an apartment house. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D. 823, 5 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medwin-v-graf-nyappdiv-1938.