Medtronic Navigation, Inc. v. Brainlab Medizinische Computersysteme GMBH

219 F. App'x 993

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Medtronic Navigation, Inc. v. Brainlab Medizinische Computersysteme GMBH. Read the opinion of the Court — 222 F. App'x 952 →

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 14, 2007·No. No. 2006-1289·Published

Opinion

ORDER

A combined petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc having been filed by the Appellant, and the petition for rehearing, having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service,

UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is

ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing be, and the same hereby is, DENIED and it is further

[994]*994ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.

The mandate of the court mil issue on March 21, 2007.

Circuit Judge Moore did not participate in the vote.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is

ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing be, and the same hereby is, DENIED and it is further

[994]*994ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.

The mandate of the court mil issue on March 21, 2007.

Circuit Judge Moore did not participate in the vote.

Medtronic Navigation, Inc. v. Brainlab Medizinische Computersysteme GMBH, 219 F. App'x 993 (Fed. Cir. 2007).

Pincite

219 F. App'x 993 (Medtronic Navigation, Inc. v. Brainlab Medizinische Computersysteme GMBH) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.