Medtronic Inc. v. Nuvasive, Inc.
This text of Medtronic Inc. v. Nuvasive, Inc. (Medtronic Inc. v. Nuvasive, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
MEDTRONIC INC., Appellant
v.
NUVASIVE, INC., Appellee ______________________
2014-1722 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,247. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JUSTIN J. OLIVER, Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by STEPHEN EDWARD BELISLE; NINA SHREVE, New York, NY.
MICHAEL T. ROSATO, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Seattle, WA, argued for appellee. Also repre- sented by PAUL DAVID TRIPODI, II, Los Angeles, CA; CRAIG E. COUNTRYMAN, Fish & Richardson, P.C., San Diego, CA; FRANK SCHERKENBACH, Boston, MA; STEPHEN REYNOLD SCHAEFER, MICHAEL J. KANE, Minneapolis, MN. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 14, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Medtronic Inc. v. Nuvasive, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medtronic-inc-v-nuvasive-inc-cafc-2015.