Medtek, Inc. v. Shinseki

401 F. App'x 547
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedNovember 16, 2010
Docket2010-1506
StatusUnpublished

This text of 401 F. App'x 547 (Medtek, Inc. v. Shinseki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Medtek, Inc. v. Shinseki, 401 F. App'x 547 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Opinion

ON MOTION

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

The court treats Medtek, Inc.’s (Medtek) letter, received by the court on August 30, 2010, as a motion for reconsideration of the court’s previous rejection of Medtek’s appeal as untimely. Medtek also moves for an extension of time.

Medtek appeals from a February 4, 2010 decision of the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals. Medtek indicates that it received the decision on February 4, 2010. Medtek filed this appeal on August 10, 2010, or 187 days later.

A Civilian Board of Contract Appeals decision is final unless a contractor appeals to this court within 120 days after its receipt of the decision. 41 U.S.C. § 607(g)(1). This filing period is mandatory and jurisdictional. Placeway Const. Corp. v. United States, 713 F.2d 726, 728 (Fed.Cir.1983); see also Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007) (the timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement that cannot be waived). Medtek’s appeal was not filed within 120 days. We must therefore dismiss this appeal as untimely.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) Medtek’s motion for reconsideration is denied. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Medtek’s motion for an extension of time is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowles v. Russell
551 U.S. 205 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Placeway Construction Corporation v. The United States
713 F.2d 726 (Federal Circuit, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
401 F. App'x 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medtek-inc-v-shinseki-cafc-2010.