Medrano Wamea v. Holder

360 F. App'x 920
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 30, 2009
Docket06-73646
StatusUnpublished

This text of 360 F. App'x 920 (Medrano Wamea v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Medrano Wamea v. Holder, 360 F. App'x 920 (9th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ofelia Medrano Wamea, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying her motion to reconsider. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Medrano Wamea’s motion to reconsider because the motion was untimely and failed to specify error in the IJ’s removal order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1), (2).

To the extent Medrano Wamea seeks an extension of her voluntary departure period, the request is denied. See Zazueta-Carrillo v. Ashcroft, 322 F.3d 1166, 1172 (9th Cir.2003); see also Garcia v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1157, 1159 (9th Cir.2004) (order).

Medrano Wamea’s remaining contentions lack merit.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
360 F. App'x 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medrano-wamea-v-holder-ca9-2009.