Medo Photo Supply Corporation v. David Livingston

386 F.2d 451, 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2032, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4198
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 12, 1967·No. 31707·Published

Opinion

386 F.2d 451

MEDO PHOTO SUPPLY CORPORATION and Alco Photo Supply Corporation, Appellants,
v.
David LIVINGSTON, as President of District 65, Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, AFL-CIO, Appellee.

No. 231.

Docket 31707.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued December 12, 1967.

Decided December 12, 1967.

Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Motley, J., denying appellants' motion to vacate a labor arbitration award.

Leonard L. Berliner, New York City, (Baer, Marks, Friedman & Berliner), New York City, for appellants.

Eugene G. Eisner, New York City, for appellee.

Before KAUFMAN, ANDERSON and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We have affirmed in open court the decision below on the basis of Judge Motley's comprehensive opinion, reported at 274 F.Supp. 209 (S.D.N.Y.1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Medo Photo Supply Corporation v. David Livingston, 386 F.2d 451, 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2032, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4198 (2d Cir. 1967).

386 F.2d 451 (Medo Photo Supply Corporation v. David Livingston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Livingston
274 F. Supp. 209 (S.D. New York, 1967)