Medlock v. Spearman, Supervisor

194 S.E. 21, 185 S.C. 296, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 33
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedNovember 30, 1937
Docket14577
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 194 S.E. 21 (Medlock v. Spearman, Supervisor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Medlock v. Spearman, Supervisor, 194 S.E. 21, 185 S.C. 296, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 33 (S.C. 1937).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice Stabeer.

This appeal is from an order of his Honor, Judge Oxner, refusing the appellant’s application for release from imprisonment by habeas corpus. The pertinent facts set out in the order are sufficient for an understanding of the matter, and need not be repeated here.

We have given much consideration to the questions raised by the exceptions; and arguments of counsel, with authorities cited, have been helpful to the Court in reaching a decision. We think that the conclusions of the Circuit Judge, for the reasons stated by him, are correct; and we deem it unnecessary to add, by way of further discussion of the questions involved, anything to what he has said. We approve his construction of Section 11 of Act 232, Acts of 1935; and, as pointed out in his decree, the remedy of the appellant for the correction of judicial errors, if any, made on his trial before Judge Mann, was by appeal. See Ex parte Klugh, 132 S. C., 199, 128 S. E., 882, and cases therein cited; Ex parte Boyle, 128 S. C., 535, 123 S. E., 9; Ex parte Bess, 152 S. C., 410, 150 S. E., 54, 65 A. L. R., 1459.

The order appealed from, which will be reported, is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker and Fishburne concur. Mr. Justice Carter did not participate on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Taylor
178 S.E.2d 244 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1970)
Sullivan v. State
159 S.E.2d 918 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1968)
Dickson v. South Carolina
272 F. Supp. 674 (D. South Carolina, 1967)
Bailey v. MacDougall
145 S.E.2d 425 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1965)
State v. Liles
142 S.E.2d 433 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1965)
Wyatt v. State
133 S.E.2d 120 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1963)
Douglas v. Hall
93 S.E.2d 891 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1956)
State v. Mitchell
68 S.E.2d 350 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 S.E. 21, 185 S.C. 296, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medlock-v-spearman-supervisor-sc-1937.