Medlock Crossing Shopping Ctr. Duluth, Ga. Ltd. Partnership v. TT Medlock Crossing, LLC

2022 NY Slip Op 06392
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 10, 2022
Docket828 CA 21-01677
StatusPublished

This text of 2022 NY Slip Op 06392 (Medlock Crossing Shopping Ctr. Duluth, Ga. Ltd. Partnership v. TT Medlock Crossing, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Medlock Crossing Shopping Ctr. Duluth, Ga. Ltd. Partnership v. TT Medlock Crossing, LLC, 2022 NY Slip Op 06392 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Medlock Crossing Shopping Ctr. Duluth, Ga. Ltd. Partnership v TT Medlock Crossing, LLC (2022 NY Slip Op 06392)
Medlock Crossing Shopping Ctr. Duluth, Ga. Ltd. Partnership v TT Medlock Crossing, LLC
2022 NY Slip Op 06392
Decided on November 10, 2022
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 10, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

828 CA 21-01677

[*1]MEDLOCK CROSSING SHOPPING CENTER DULUTH, GA. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

TT MEDLOCK CROSSING, LLC, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND WILLIAM P. ALLEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)


THE LAW OFFICE OF MARK A. YOUNG, ROCHESTER (BRIDGET L. FIELD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, ROCHESTER (CURTIS A. JOHNSON OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (William K. Taylor, J.), dated September 24, 2021. The order denied the motion of defendant William P. Allen for leave to reargue his opposition to plaintiff's prior motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Medlock Crossing Shopping Ctr. Duluth, GA. Ltd. Partnership v TT Medlock Crossing, LLC ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Nov. 10, 2022] [4th Dept 2022]).

Entered: November 10, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2022 NY Slip Op 06392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medlock-crossing-shopping-ctr-duluth-ga-ltd-partnership-v-tt-medlock-nyappdiv-2022.