Home/D.C. Circuit/Medlin v. United States. (Two Cases). House v. United States

Medlin v. United States. (Two Cases). House v. United States

207 F.2d 33
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedOctober 12, 1953
Docket11484-11486
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 207 F.2d 33 (Medlin v. United States. (Two Cases). House v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Medlin v. United States. (Two Cases). House v. United States, 207 F.2d 33 (D.C. Cir. 1953).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants were indicted and convicted of assault “with a dangerous weapon, that is, shoes” on their feet. There was substantial evidence that each appellant kicked the complaining witness. He was seriously injured.

Appellants contend that shoes on feet are not dangerous weapons. We think it clear that they are, at least when they inflict serious injuries. Cf. Tatum v. United States, 71 App.D.C. 393, 110 F. 2d 555. Appellants’ other contentions do not require discussion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perry v. United States
36 A.3d 799 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2011)
United States v. Tony Jerome Murphy
35 F.3d 143 (Fourth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Paul Alphonso Payne, United States of America v. Jeremiah Chambers
19 F.3d 1431 (Fourth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Sheldon Schoenborn
4 F.3d 1424 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)
Arthur v. United States
602 A.2d 174 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1992)
Moore v. United States
599 A.2d 1381 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1991)
State ex rel. J. R.
398 A.2d 150 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
State, in Interest of Jr
398 A.2d 150 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Freeman v. United States
391 A.2d 239 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1978)
Grass v. People
471 P.2d 602 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1970)
Robert L. Logan v. United States
411 F.2d 679 (D.C. Circuit, 1969)
United States v. Barber
297 F. Supp. 917 (D. Delaware, 1969)
James W. Parker v. United States
359 F.2d 1009 (D.C. Circuit, 1966)
State v. Lavallee
189 A.2d 475 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1963)
State v. Bradley
116 N.W.2d 439 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1962)
United States v. Anderson
190 F. Supp. 589 (D. Maryland, 1961)
United States v. Hamilton
182 F. Supp. 548 (District of Columbia, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 F.2d 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medlin-v-united-states-two-cases-house-v-united-states-cadc-1953.